Jonathan,
My guess is that the "purpose" of evolution is to evolve.
MoQ is a more evolved then SOM. It doesn't put teleological
and causal frameworks at odds with each other so neither should
we--- so the purpose of teleology is to teleologize, just kidding,
I guess I see that there is a purpose to the incorporation of
teleology but not sure what you mean by asking the purpose of
teleology.
just wanted to add two quotes from an essay watson's essay
"i seem to be a verb"
"I have always
preferred Ez's rendering of Dao as "process" on the basis of Ernest
Fenollosa's claim that ideograms render "noun and verb as one -- things in
motion, motion in things."
"The view never seems quite the same twice. Waves, sun, fogs, seasons, dogs,
dolphins, moons, planets, stars -- all seem flowing, as if every kind of
evolution, cosmic to biological,parades before me."
erin
>JON:My question to everyone: Does teleology have a purpose?
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:29 BST