Bo and Jonathan and gang:
Bo Writes:
<<<<<<<<<<<<
However, Roger seems to have taken Jonathan's "ivory tower" bait,
admitting that Q- Intellect has made serious mistakes..
Again, Hitler and gang coming together THINKING out how to
exterminate unwanted people is not mental activity in the service of
Intellect. To kill is NOT an intellectual value! >>>>>>>>>
Actually, I meant to use Nazis as an example of a SOCIAL value gone astray to
refute the argument that Jonathan believes that the U.S. was the birth place
of Eugenics, and that it sprung from the intellect. I agree with you.
Bo:<<<<<<<<<
Still, to call eugenics "same old shit" is correct Intellect but not
quite correct MOQ (I always come to the "beyond intellect" notion).
The values of the Q-hierarchy are good ....to the level it concerns,
it's what constitute them. If catastrophe were to strike and humanity
had to retreat to the social level, we would not stop THINKING, but
intellectual values would disappear and we would start to practice
eugenics - for example - like the Inuits of old who put their old and
infirm on ice floes to succumb. Except that it would not be
"eugenics" any longer, but good old tradition. The old people were
the first to accept their fate; it was the way it HAD to be.
The above only to demonstrate my point, let's hope everything goes
well and Intellect remains in power and that we may continue to call
it "old shit".
>>>>>>>>>>>
Which leads to this month's topic...... how do we define an intellectual
pattern. Is it every thought? And if so, then why isn't a thought on the
glorious benefits of a "superior master race" an intellectual pattern?
Roger
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:42 BST