>From owner-moq_discuss@mill.venus.co.uk Wed Dec 16 22:22:54 1998
>Received: from [193.243.229.112] by hotmail.com (1.0) with SMTP id
MHotMail309132848833435065324983253986672651580; Wed Dec 16 22:22:54
1998
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
> by mill.venus.co.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) id GAA16958
> for moq_discuss-outgoing; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 06:16:19 GMT
>Received: from mail.airmail.net (mail.airmail.net [206.66.12.40])
> by mill.venus.co.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id GAA16954
> for <moq_discuss@moq.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 06:16:16 GMT
>Received: from wittler from [207.136.20.216] by mail.airmail.net
> (/\##/\ Smail3.1.30.16 #30.370) with smtp for <moq_discuss@moq.org>
sender: <mwittler@geocities.com>
> id <m0zqSo5-0002vCE@mail.airmail.net>; Mon, 31 Aug 70 02:22:41 -0500
(CDT)
>Message-ID: <002601be2962$683218c0$d81488cf@wittler.airmail.net>
>From: "Mary" <mwittler@geocities.com>
>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
>Subject: Re: MD Scientific Pantheism vs Cosmotheism
>Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 20:08:45 -0600
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>
>Hi Paul and Squad,
Hello Mary and Squad,
>
>Paul:
>>Cosmotheism is not " Politically Correct ", the way that Scientific
>>Pantheism is, but, Cosmotheism, is very intellectually honest, in a
way
>>that, Scientific Pantheism, has not yet evolved towards, but it will,
>>and must. Reality will out, even if it is not liked very much, for the
>>Truth, can be ugly, but is of the Highest Value of The Good or
>>Excellence.
>>Cosmotheism will win out, Ken, and will become the predominant idea in
>>the world of the near future, especially if Pirsigs' MOQ is accepted,
as
>>the new metaphysics, for this future. The Truth, always wins out, in
the
>>long run, just given enough time.
>>
>
>
>I did an admittedly small amount of research on Cosmotheism. There
isn't
>that much on the net, but what references I did find all referred to
someone
>named Pierce. He is apparently the founder of a church here in the US
by
>that name and is also the author of "The Turner Diaries".
So far correct, Mary, Dr. William L. Pierce, a former physics professor,
and Chairman, of the National Alliance.
This book was
>supposedly among the favorites of Timothy McVey, whom you all may
recall as
>being one of the person's convicted of the Oklahoma City federal
building
>bombing attack - which killed several hundred people.
The Turner Diaries, Mary, was a fictional novel about domestic
terrorism, so that is hardly surprising.
Pierce is uniformly
>described as an anti-Semitic neo-nazi. He leads what is known in this
>country as a "hate group".
Dr. Pierce is uniformly described as such, by the hostile media, as are
any groups or persons, this media does not like. This media, will often
label, quite slanderously, as a " Hate Group ", their enemies, without
having any objective criteria, to support such charges.
A search of cosmotheism at Amazon turned up
>absolutely nothing. Apparently, one can't even buy "The Turner
Diaries"
>there.
Mary, look in the on-line encyclopedias. You will find it. Also, you can
get the Turner Diaries at Borders Bookstores, or from Natvan.com
directly.
>
>While I've been recently accused of having a closed mind <great big
honest
>grin & bowing and scraping where necessary>, I'm having a hard time
>accepting your embrace of Cosmotheism. Since I know essentially
nothing
>about it and can't even order the book if I should want to, could you
>explain something about it for those of us in the dark?
First of all, Mary, how can you have a hard time accepting my embrace of
Cosmotheism, when you know nothing about it?!!! You do have a closed
mind, if you think like this!
The Turner Diaries, will tell you nothing about Cosmotheism. It is a
fictional novel about domestic terrorism. Dr. Pierce would be the best
source for discovering, for yourself, what Cosmotheism is all about.
Ask him yourself, at Natvan.com.
Why do you feel it
>will win out?
It is a Truth that best fits the facts of Reality.
What does it have in common with the MOQ?
Cosmotheism, like the MOQ, relates the world through Value, which is
Reality. It too, orders the world through levels of awareness, through
Dynamic Quality. There are many other similarities, I can relate to you
off-line, if you want to discuss it in greater depth.
Why would a person
>who espouses anti-Semitism be of high quality (assuming that's what
you
>meant, of course)?
I donīt define someone, by labeling them. That is of low quality, Mary,
donīt you think? I think you should ask the person, in question,
yourself, before determining who is espousing what and why and for what
purpose, donīt you think? Mary, do ask Dr. Pierce, if he espouses
anti-semitism, himself. Do not take his enemies word for it!
>
>Thanx,
You are welcome!
Paul.
>Mary
>
>
>
>homepage - http://www.moq.org
>queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
>unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
>body of email
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:46 BST