Dear Ken,
Excellent Cosmotheist perspective Ken! Universal Quality or Morality
supercedes our limited Human Morality. Only by aligning our Human
Morality with Universal Morality, will we continue to Survive and
Evolve!
Best Regards,
PAUL.
>From owner-moq_discuss@mill.venus.co.uk Sun Jan 10 22:46:01 1999
>Received: from [193.243.229.112] by hotmail.com (1.0) with SMTP id
MHotMail30934899575761335065324953253986672401980; Sun Jan 10 22:46:01
1999
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
> by mill.venus.co.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) id GAA12291
> for moq_discuss-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 06:45:28 GMT
>Received: from mail.netsites.net (mainserver.netsites.net
[207.2.194.130])
> by mill.venus.co.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id GAA12287
> for <moq_discuss@moq.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 06:45:25 GMT
>Message-Id: <199901110645.GAA12287@mill.venus.co.uk>
>Received: from Pclark [207.2.194.20] by mail.netsites.net with ESMTP
> (SMTPD32-4.06) id AEAB61E02A8; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:48:11 CST
>From: "Clark" <clark@netsites.net>
>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
>Subject: MD Subject/Object Metaphysics.
>Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:54:23 -0600
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Priority: 3
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>
>Struan, Mary, Platt and squad,
> It seems to me that where we get into trouble with our definitions is
>that we attempt to define morality, good, value, etc. in terms of what
is
>the perceived good of the human race.
> If we look at the origins of our situation here we can better define
>morality, good, value etc. in terms of our overall relationship to the
>evolution of the universe. Looking at our position in the context of
the
>evolution of the universe it seems to me that the workings of universal
>evolution, since it has produced us, cannot fail to be beneficial to
the
>human race since we are part and parcel of the process. In this view,
>morality, good, value, Quality are bestowed on us by universal
evolution
>and our responsibility should be to exist in harmony with that process.
>Since our immediate concern is the viability of the Earth we should
devote
>ourselves to living in harmony with the living entity that is the
>biosphere. It is when we allow our immediate concerns to cloud our
>judgement and cause us to make decisions that are detrimental to the
only
>home that we have in the universe that we begin to make immoral and
>valueless decisions.
> That is why I separate universal Quality and Human Quality in my
mind.
>The two are not always compatible. The first area of agreement we need
to
>thresh out is the definition of Quality, Value, good, and morality in
terms
>of our true position in the universe. If we wish to view Quality as God
>that is fine as long as we don't interpret our immediate desires as his
>commandments. Ken
>
>
>
>homepage - http://www.moq.org
>queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
>unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
>body of email
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:49 BST