ROGER CONTINUES TO USE THESE ALL CAP's LEAD-INS FOR NO APPARENT REASON
To Bo and Glove:
Bodvar wrote:
<< It is what the Dynamic-Static split
is all about: the static diversity is inherently bad compared to the
dynamic wholeness. But then why is the static "migration" bad,
after all it's supposed to be towards DQ ? I see no weakness in the
MOQ, but this is perhaps the border surrounding the new metaphysics;
much larger than SOM's, but still a limit. Do you have any "thots"?
>>
Actually , I like what Glove just wrote:
<<< ......it is necessary to drop the notion of good OR
evil in favor of good AND evil, or even better, simply drop the whole notion
in favor of complementarity. See reality as a holistic event, as others have
suggested. Of course, then the problem of Good comes up...if everything is
Quality, the Good, where is the bad, the evil? My answer would be...IF one
looks for evil, it will manifest as a perceived stasis in the Metaphysics of
Quality. IF one looks for Good, it will manifest as Dynamic Quality, or
value forces, which we cannot perceive directly, but only by their
passing.>>>>
Roger
PS You ever wonder if the Dalai Lama's wristwatch has a second hand on it?
MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mailing List Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
Unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with
UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in the body of the email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:50 BST