Hej
Struan wrote:
> Blimey, just think what might happen if I removed my head
> from the sand and actually thought about
> it then!!
Go right ahead! This is the forum for such deeds.
> >But such ambiguities leaves us open to misunderstandings which
> >not seldom leads to harsh words and name calling.
>
> Including side swipes related to heads and sand no doubt.
I meant no offence with that one. I just thought it was funny and it
was intended to clear some smoke after the gun fights here recently.
I thought, and still think, that you can take it with a smile.
> Precisely. This is why I introduced the idea of an holistic
> approach to the MoQ. If more people, "
> get to know all interpretations and contexts," of
> Materialism, Complementarity etc, instead of
> seeing just one naive example, then they may see that the
> oppositional stance of the MoQ is often
> misguided and that SOM is, at best, a sop to those who need
> to feel, 'enlightened.'
Ok, some of us need to learn some more interpretations and
contexts of various other world views, I agree and I'm one
of them. But I really think you need some self-reflection about
this. Yesterday, you said the non-PC thing "You are also correct
that I don't equate Quality to morality", (what's PC?), and I
don't see much value in a "holistic approach to the MoQ" without it.
Magnus
MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:50 BST