Re: MD The Social Construction of Reality

From: MarshaV (marshalz@i-2000.com)
Date: Sun Aug 08 2004 - 19:28:19 BST

Next message: Ian Glendinning: "Re: MD MOQ psycology (?)"

Previous message: Ian Glendinning: "MD Re: Don't let me be misunderstood."
In reply to: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD The Social Construction of Reality"
Next in thread: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD The Social Construction of Reality"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 01:21 PM 8/8/2004 -0400, you wrote:

Distortions?
Certainly.
What is a man? What is a woman? Are not these labels SOM convention to a very large extent? In the early history of New Orleans there were 9 different degrees of negro. Men and Women between the 9 were discouraged from mixing. Now that's a complex social construction of reality don't you feel?!

All the best,
Mark

Mark,

My point is that the old label (God in all his maleness, for instance) represents something to move to a higher quality, Everything-Is-Connected-To-Everything. Shouldn't it be a new word without the old connotations?

I suppose I'm way over my head.

MarshaV

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archives: Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Ian Glendinning: "Re: MD MOQ psycology (?)"
Previous message: Ian Glendinning: "MD Re: Don't let me be misunderstood."
In reply to: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD The Social Construction of Reality"
Next in thread: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD The Social Construction of Reality"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 08 2004 - 19:43:05 BST