From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Sun Aug 29 2004 - 00:55:36 BST
Paul:
-- the MOQ is itself a conceptualisation of experience, and so from a
conventional, pragmatic, static point of view, static quality is
different from (but not independent of) Dynamic Quality. This is the
point of view from which LILA is written and is the point of view from
which Mark's "coherence" is operating (I think).
-- As I understand it, Mark's employment of coherence *does* recognise
the relationship between static and Dynamic Quality as being
co-dependent. However, I won't intervene in this part of the discussion
any further
Hi Paul,
This is indeed how i see it. You are most welcome to contribute whenever you
wish.
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 29 2004 - 00:55:56 BST