RE: MD A bit of reasoning

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat Sep 11 2004 - 02:55:21 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD and the LIE DETECTOR test"

    Two cents from dmb:
    I think universals and particulars would both be considered static patterns
    in the MOQ. Universals would be found among social and intellectual level
    patterns while particulars would be found among organic and inorganic
    patterns. But they really just boil down to the old mind and matter debates,
    which are a symptom of SOM's flaws. In the MOQ, I imagine the questions
    about universals and particulars are pretty much dissolved. Both are
    considered equally real, although the important distinctions remain.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Scott Roberts [mailto:jse885@earthlink.net]
    Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 10:19 AM
    To: moq_discuss
    Subject: MD A bit of reasoning

    All,
     
    Here's some reasoning, a kind of summary of some things I've been saying
    lately, and I'm curious about what you all make of it.
     
    1. Are static patterns of value universals or particulars? Answer: They must
    be universals, as implied by the word "pattern". A particular, once it
    exists, cannot be changed. Only the rules for producing particulars can be
    changed, and so it is only as universals that there is value for the
    present and future (the particular does serve to exemplify the universal,
    however) .
     
    2. DQ works with existing SQ to produce new SQ. (MOQ thesis).
     
    3. The word for working with universals to produce new universals is
    intellect, as it is a matter of evaluating existing universals (concepts,
    rules) by imagining the consequences of choosing among possibilities, and
    making the choice.
     
    4. Therefore, DQ is intellect-in-use, and all SQ are static intellectual
    patterns of value (which may be subdivided into inorganic, biological,
    social, and purely intellectual (mathematics, for example) static
    intellectual patterns of value. This does not imply that my thought of, say,
    plant growth is plant growth. It does suggest that my thought of plant
    growth is a pale reflection of the thought that grows plants).
     
    5. Therefore, Quality is Intellect (while not ceasing to be Quality).
     
    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 11 2004 - 03:13:43 BST