Re: MD A bit of reasoning

From: Scott Roberts (jse885@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Sep 15 2004 - 03:56:59 BST

  • Next message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD A bit of reasoning"

    David M,

    > DM: I spoke of purpose, I totally agree that solution in not likely, the
    > point is to
    > grasp the significance of these questions. I precisely think MOQ does
    grasp
    > that Q/S/O is an alternative triunity. Pirsig clearly speaks about the way
    > SOM
    > cuts the world up analytically and that MOQ does exactly the same sort of
    > cutting only at different locations, hence the suggestion that you could
    say
    > levels
    > 1+2 relate to objects and levels 3+4 to subjects.

    [Scott:] I am using the word 'triunity' in its theological sense (though I
    am NOT trying to tie the triunity I am talking about to the Christian one.)
    The MOQ says that all is Quality, about which we cannot be analytical, but
    for metaphysical purposes we can divide things up into DQ and SQ. A
    triunity, however, is three whatevers that are one without ceasing to be
    three, which means we cannot be analytical about it, since, from an
    analytical point of view, it is paradoxical.

    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 15 2004 - 03:57:30 BST