From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Wed Nov 24 2004 - 01:13:28 GMT
On 23 Nov 2004 at 1:30, Ian Glendinning wrote:
I think the key is noticing when the intellectual debate you're
having is validly constrained by social "convention" - but as I say,
I'm new in this territory. I've been waiting two years for MD
discussions to get to this point free of the religious and
scientific baggage.
I think the "debate" between levels of MoQ *IS* the source of truth.
msh says:
I agree. But I don't understand what you said before. When is
intellectual debate validly constrained by social convention? Did
you mean to say invalidly constrained? IMO, any societal constraint
on debate or any other free exchange and interaction of ideas is
invalid and immoral. Always.
Later,
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
--
InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
"Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
everything." -- Henri Poincare'
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 24 2004 - 01:14:02 GMT