Re: MD Empiricism

From: Joseph Maurer (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Sat Dec 04 2004 - 17:48:01 GMT

Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Is Morality Relative?"

Previous message: Erin: "Re: Re: MD Is Morality Relative?"
In reply to: Erin: "Re: MD Empiricism"
Next in thread: David Harding: "Re: MD Empiricism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On 02 December 2004 10:13 PM Erin writes to David H,

[Erin] Yes I am aware of this but I wasn't questioning what the unicorn "was", it was more about wanting to clearly know what "empirical" can be applied to... I did "experience" a unicorn regardless of what it "was" and I thought I was told that experience was what is necessary for it to be empirical. If art is being accepted as empirical because you can experience it, then I don't see why the unicorn can't be either

Hi Erin, David H, and all,

In the Edge of Chaos on moq.org Mark Maxwell describes a sweet spot as coherence between sq patterns. IMO the sweet spot is experience.

Joe

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Is Morality Relative?"
Previous message: Erin: "Re: Re: MD Is Morality Relative?"
In reply to: Erin: "Re: MD Empiricism"
Next in thread: David Harding: "Re: MD Empiricism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 04 2004 - 17:49:41 GMT