Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Wed Feb 16 2005 - 18:08:08 GMT

  • Next message: Matt Kundert: "Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"

    Ron,

    IMHO the "aether" is due for a comeback.
    (ie with minimal tweaking, adjusted for relativity, it's not a bad metaphor
    for that quantum soup, or chaotic void, whatever.)

    Ian
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ron Winchester" <phaedruswolff@hotmail.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:16 AM
    Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

    > Ron shows his ignorance;
    > "The nothingness that we don't understand was proven by Quantum Physics"
    >
    > Scott;
    > While I think your use of the word "proven" is a gross overstatement, I
    > think there is some relation with mystical talk on nothingness and quantum
    > physics, but I'd like you to expand on how you see it.
    >
    > Hi Scott,
    >
    > The word 'Proven' is a gross overstatement, and should be excluded from
    > philosophical language. :o)
    >
    > That was a slip on my part. I should never have said proven.
    >
    > As I see it, the nothingness of non-deity Zen is the same as the void,
    > nothingness, or 'Quantum Soup.' It is all theory, and as like every theory
    > we have had prior, such as Aether have been 'Reconsidered' (as opposed to
    > disproven:)
    >
    > The only compliment of Quantum Physics to Nothingness of Zen is that both
    > Quantum Physics and Zen have realized that they do not 'Know' what this
    > nothingness consists of. Any knowledge we have is temporary. All we think
    > we know is that everything came from this Nothingness for lack of a word
    > because it cannot be described.
    >
    > Let's just say that Quantum Physics leads us to think a bit closer toward
    > Eastern philosophy, or what can be termed as spirituality.
    >
    > On empirical and SOM, and the MOQ being stuck on SOM in its use of the
    > word empirical, is that I see you accepting, or being confused that a
    > Mystic Experience is something other than enlightenment as to how the
    > world is, that does not come from some 'Out There' field or force.
    >
    > The difference between enlightenment and the Christian Mystical Experience
    > is that you know prior to the experience what you are going to experience
    > when you are looking for the Virgin Mary. An Enlightened Mystical
    > Experience is something that comes to you from what I would call 'Within.'
    >
    > I have been warned about using the term intuition, but I am thinking we
    > already have within us the knowledge, but just do not see it as we are
    > preconditioned to a belief system that was built into us from childhood
    > on. The mystical experience in Eastern spirituality comes from separating
    > ourselves from our prejudices as to what we "Think we know.' Quantum
    > Physics lend to this in the 'Knower and the Known' that you mentioned
    > before are the same. Eastern spirituality does not tell us what to look
    > for in a mystical experience. Quantum Soup is simply an extenstion to the
    > idea that this nothingness can not be known; it has no characteristics
    > that we can understand.
    >
    > ('Quantum Soup' is just slang thrown at the physicists for their lack of
    > ability to accept something that cannot be proven)
    >
    > Thinking of Quantum Soup brings me to some thoughts about 'Emprical Data.'
    > It seems to me that in most fields, the use of the term 'Empirical Data'
    > is more of an insult thrown toward the Empiricists, or those who depend
    > too much on what is considered emprical data.
    >
    > Ron
    >
    >>From: "Scott Roberts" <jse885@localnet.com>
    >>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >>Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic
    >>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:21:47 -0700
    >>
    >>Ron,
    >>
    >>Ron said: This is where I see the difficulty Scott is having with
    >>empiricism.
    >>
    >>Scott:
    >>You see wrong. Like DMB, you take what I say and then add humongous
    >>assumptions to what I say and argue on the basis of those erroneous
    >>assumptions. I then have to spend a ridiculous amount saying "that's not
    >>what I said". Somehow, you have interpreted my objecting to Pirsig's
    >>expansion of the word 'empiricism' to the belief that I think that
    >>changing
    >>the usage of all words is a bad thing. In my first post about this subject
    >>I
    >>explicitly denied that.
    >>
    >>You have some notion of what I think about mystical events, but I'm not
    >>even
    >>sure what it is. Do you think that I think that all mystical events are
    >>equally valid or invalid? That a vision of the Virgin Mary should be
    >>treated
    >>the same as Zen satori? I do not.
    >>
    >>You seem to think that I am stuck in SOM prejudices. I think the MOQ is
    >>stuck in SOM prejudices, for example, in calling itself "empirical". If we
    >>are going to debate this you have got to resist your tendency to go off on
    >>big rambles based on wrong assumptions about what I think. If you're not
    >>sure what I think, then ask, and I will clarify as well as I can.
    >>
    >>Meanwhile, I am curious about this sentence:
    >>
    >>"The nothingness that we don't understand was proven by Quantum Physics"
    >>
    >>While I think your use of the word "proven" is a gross overstatement, I
    >>think there is some relation with mystical talk on nothingness and quantum
    >>physics, but I'd like you to expand on how you see it.
    >>
    >>- Scott
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >>Mail Archives:
    >>Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >>Nov '02 Onward -
    >>http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >>MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >>
    >>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >>
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
    > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 16 2005 - 18:20:07 GMT