Re: MD Nihilism (Punk)

From: hampday@earthlink.net
Date: Sun Feb 27 2005 - 09:41:57 GMT

  • Next message: MarshaV: "Re: MD Nihilism (Punk)"

    Arlo--

    I wrote:
    > In music it [nihilism] has taken the form
    > of "punk rock" whose chaotic song patterns and morbid or obscene lyrics
    > depict life's meaninglessness and amorality.

    You replied:
    > While you make many good points about nihilism, the punk is me has to take
    > some umbridge at this inaccurate categorization. Rock music has its
    origins
    > in social protest of injustice and inequality. It became a caricaturish
    > mockery of itself when it became commoditized and embraced by the very
    > establishment it sought to criticize. "Punk" was a movement in rock to
    > strip it of its ridiculous commercial veneer and reclaim it as a form of
    > social rebellion.
    >
    > In this way, "punk" is not nihilistic. Punk is counter-cultural.

    Unlike you, I apparently have no 'punk' in me, and thus have a problem
    accepting "rock concerts" as anything but riotous behavior energized by
    electronically distorted noise that rarely, if ever, takes on the aspects of
    music (at least as that term may be applied to an art form).
    "Counter-cultural" is too nice: I would call 'punk' and its expression
    anti-cultural, animalistic, primitive. If these exhibitionists insist on
    being millionaire pop idols at the sacrifice of our cultural heritage, how
    do they serve as a model for our youth? To what pit of debauchery do they
    conspire to lead us? Forget about what "music is supposed to be" -- what
    VALUES are they advocating beyond uninhibited sex, social upheaval, and
    revolt against authority? Is there any semblance of personal
    responsibility, rationality, or harmony in their call to violence?

    > You may, of course, support being a good sheep and embracing social norms,
    whatever
    > they may be, without any critical lens to the structuring nature of social
    > "normalcy". And, if that is they embodiment of anti-nihilism, then perhaps
    > that is your choice. But do not confuse rebellion against norms with
    nihilism.

    Social norms, as you call them, are the refinements of human culture that
    have enabled man to become a civilized creature, in large measure by
    enhancing his sensibility and intellectual appreciation of the values of
    life. Is this not the message of Dynamic Quality to which you MoQers
    aspire? The rap 'artist' is an offense to civilization; he wants to tear
    it all down and start afresh with a new world order based on a
    let-it-all-hang-out, free-love, anti-intellectual mentality. You may see
    this as harmless "self-expression"; but the philosophy that it espouses is a
    threat to society. Civilization does not advance by eschewing cultural
    values and individual responsibility. Indeed, it's precisely the loss of
    these values that has led our younger generation into lives of crime,
    addiction, unwanted pregnancies and intellectual dysfunction. If you would
    apply your "critical lens" to this rebellion against norms, I think you
    would see that it is both irrational and nihilistic.

    > I think a much better "example" of nihilism and music would be John Cage.
    > There is your "chaotic song patterns". The Sex Pistols, The Ramones, The
    > Clash... all of these bands use song patterns. To suggest otherwise is
    > simply foolish. As to "morbid and obscene lyrics", I can only believe that
    > you've never really listened to many of the bands you call "punk".

    John Cage was novelistic in his approach to classical music, as were the
    electronic composers and the minimalists -- even the atonalists, for that
    matter. But they all worked within a structural framework -- even if it was
    of their own devising -- and none of them (insofar as I know) were
    attempting to destroy the cultural heritage that preceded them.

    (You're right; I've never found the punk bands worth listening to.)

    > To sum, to rebel against social injustice or normative activity is hardly
    > nihilistic.

    How is the musician qualified to challenge social norms; does he know
    something about "social justice" in his drug-induced stupor that the average
    taxpaying citizen doesn't?

    This is more than just an aside, Arlo. I totally disagree with your
    conclusion. Undermining the values on which a culture is founded, and
    offering nothing but social revolution to replace them, is nihilism in its
    most blatant form.

    Ham

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 27 2005 - 09:45:42 GMT