Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

From: Dan Glover (daneglover@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 18 2005 - 06:01:07 GMT

  • Next message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Contradictions"

    Hi Erin

    Anthony is the MOQ expert, not me, and every morning I wake to find that I
    know even less. But I do get the impression that he's having a bit of fun so
    please don't get too boggled. Still, it's kind of neat to read one of my old
    posts. I cannot force myself to read them in the archives for they seem like
    trash, nothing more, and I feel deeply embarassed -- I feel like hiding my
    head in a hole in the sand and never pulling it out. But this one isn't so
    bad, surprising that it is. Thank you for sharing.

    Dan

    >From: Erin <macavity11@yahoo.com>
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic
    >Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:04:58 -0800 (PST)
    >
    >
    >
    >ANT: the MOQ is guaranteed 100% SOM free.
    >
    >
    >To explain the (*real*) reason it boggles my mind I looked for a quote
    >from Lila's child on Google and came across this, this is close enough to
    >what i was looking for--its an old post by Dan. .
    >
    > DAN: In LC, RMP explains the evolution of his thought processes
    >regarding SOM and whether it belongs in the MOQ so it seems reasonable to
    >assume his thinking on the use of mind is also an evolving set of patterns
    >and not something set in stone. It seems pretty clear to me that he does
    >equate intellectual patterns of value with mind. He says they are equal.
    >
    >
    > >
    > >As the compiler of Lila's child, may i ask: How do you feel about the use
    > >of
    > >the term mind? Is it to be avoided as RMP suggests?
    >
    >I believe he says "avoided when possible." If someone insists on the MOQ
    >giving a definition for intellectual patterns of value (even though we
    >already know what intellect is) then perhaps it's not possible to avoid the
    >use of mind, just as it's impossible to eliminate SOM.
    >
    >Erin
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 18 2005 - 06:28:41 GMT