From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Fri May 20 2005 - 12:40:19 BST
MSH writes:
> So, the problem is not that my interpretation of someone's argument
> is tainted by their politics, or mine. The problem arises when
> conclusions are endlessly repeated, hand-in-hand with a refusal to
> provide supporting argument and evidence, AT ALL. This is dogmatism
> not philosophical inquiry.
MSH as usual provides a moment of merriment by condemning conclusions that
are reached without offering evidence while at the same time reaching a
conclusion without offering evidence. I'm not surprised, however. MSH
graduated from the same school that believes with absolute certainty that
there are no absolutes.
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 20 2005 - 12:53:57 BST