Re: MD Re: Racist Remarks

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Wed Jul 27 2005 - 01:26:34 BST

  • Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Someone said..."

    Hey Sam,

    On 26 Jul 2005 at 5:31, Sam Norton wrote:

    <snip some agreement>

    However, would you think this equally objectionable (said to me back
    in March by DMB): " I mean, its not that I hate christians or
    theists, I just think they're wrong. Only crooked toothed, tea
    drinking, fish and chips eater like you could suggest that bigotry
    has anything to do with it. (I'm actually having trouble coming up
    with English sterotypes for this joke, but you get the idea. ) "

    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/14084.html

    The thing is, I do have crooked teeth, I drink an awful lot of tea, and
    after two weeks in Asia I was dying for some fish and chips. And I also
    thought it was quite funny (I find DMB funny a lot of the time). Is this
    also racist? Where do we draw the boundaries? Is it just a question of
    taking offence - in other words, if I had taken offence at DMB, would that
    in itself have made the remarks racist?

    msh 7-26-05:
    Well, lets look at the situations, as the context of the remarks are
    all-important. The exchange between you and dmb, more or less
    friendly rivals for a number of years, involved some tweaking of the
    Brits, for the purpose of making a valid point. David's American,
    you're British, so there's a friendly, funny poke.

    The context of the offensive remark under criticism is quite
    different. The exchange occurred between two reactionary, white,
    American jingoists. The comment was gratuitous, not illuminating, and
    certainly not funny, at least not to anyone with a post-pubescent
    sense of humor.

    sam 7-26-05
    I think the underlying concern I have is that bringing in the assertion of
    racism _can_ generate more heat than light.

    msh 7-26-05:
    I, for one, think the light-heat metaphor has had its play on this
    list, and should be retired to the vault of once-sacred cliches. If
    we are to survive and evolve as a species, we need both intelligence
    AND passion, and to fight hateful ignorance WITH passion where ever
    we encounter it

    sam 7-26-05
    But quite possibly I still have racist elements in my own thinking.

    msh 7-26-05:
    We all do, which is all the more reason for passionate vigilance.

    sam 7-26-05
    For example, I think a strong argument can be made for racial
    profiling when assessing potential bomb threats. Perhaps we could
    focus on that?

    msh 7-26-05:
    I think if your government wants to stop people who fit a particular
    racial profile from carrying bombs into the tube then, sure, racial
    profiling at the turnstyles is the way to go. I trust you see that
    this is not the same thing as stopping terrorist attacks against the
    citizens of London and all of England.

    Off the top of my head, I can think of three or four ways of getting
    someone else to unwittingly carry the bomb for me. And, how about
    getting into the tunnels via infrastructural entrances and planting
    bombs on the tracks? In New York, many subway trains come to the
    surface and even ride elevated rails. How about if a terrorist drops
    a downward blast-directed bomb onto the the top of a moving train?
    Or stows a dirty radiation bomb in a locker at a busy bus or airport
    terminal. Or leaves a briefcase bomb in a crowded restaurant. Or
    carries a small fission device in a suitcase and detonates it in his
    hotel room. Water supplies could be poisoned; a deadly virus could
    be released at a rock concert. The list of possibilities is almost
    endless.

    The point I hope I'm making is that security alone is not going to
    solve the problem, especially as the number of potential terrorists
    grows and grows. So, what good is racial profiling, unless you are
    willing to lock-up or otherwise 24-7 surveil everyone who matches the
    criteria? Even surveillance can tragically fail, as we've just seen
    in the fear-driven murder of Jean Charles de Menezes. In short,
    racial-profiling is not a rational response to an international
    problem created in large part by past and present actions of the UKG
    and USG. Your choices are a diplomatic effort to come to terms with
    root causes, or use your profile and, borrowing the phrase of a
    prominent contributor to this list, "kill 'em all like germs."
    Option 2 requires you to check your humanity at the door.

    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
    --
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com

    "If it turns out that there is a God, I don't think that he's evil.
    The worst you can say about him is that basically he's an
    underachiever."
    -- Woody Allen

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 27 2005 - 01:33:05 BST