From: David M (davidint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 18 2005 - 23:03:41 BST
Hi Ham
You are right to value good questions, so do I.
> I start with the theory of "proprietary awareness" as the foundation of
> what
> we call existence. I attribute the source of this awareness to Essence,
> which is uncreated and non-differentiated. I offer a hypothesis for
> Creation to explain how a dynamic, evolutionary universe arises from a
> static, timeless Source, and I show how the values that we individually
> realize as "free agents" constitute our essential reality.
DM: Yes lets start with what we cannot deny: experience, a word
that cannot do without awareness I would say. But it is not best
described as a subject aware of objects because that is an abstract
that requires positing 2 very different substances. And why do we need
an essence? That is what you want to fill the nothingness up with as if
creation needs to come from something, well I suggest that for creations
to be truly original it has to be from nothing. Anything static at the
beginining
impies limits and begs questions. I doubt I am ever going to persuade you.
Go and read some books on Heidegger and also Tarnas's Passion of the
West if youi are brave enough to challenge your own ideas. I do not
feel that you grasp the point about rejectying SOMand what to give it back
to us.
Your really at the wrong site for that.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 19 2005 - 01:01:14 BST