From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat Aug 02 2003 - 21:44:50 BST
Steve and all:
DMB said:
You haven't given us one good reason why anyone should think Pirsig means
she does when he says she doesn't. ..After the smoke clears I can see that
there is still no good reason.
Steve replied:
I disagree, and I'm anxious to hear some "good reasons" to support your
interpretation in light of Platt's list of quotes on whether she does or not
which are consistent with my interpretation.
dmb says:
Hmmm. That's almost an answer. You think the quotes support your
interpretation? Please show me how. Show me your reasoning. Don't just
assert it or declare it. Take me from the quote to your conclusion; that
Lila has intellectual quality. I don't think you can get there from here.
chapter 13:
"Does Lila have Quality? Biologically she does, socially she doesn't.
Obviously! Evolutionary morality just splits that whole question open like a
watermelon. .. Biologicall she's fine, socially she's pretty far down the
scale, INTELLECTUALLY SHE'S NOWHERE."
chapter 17:
"She missed the whole point of everything. She's after Quality, like
everybody else, but she defines it entirely in biological terms. She DOESN'T
SEE INTELLECTUAL QUALITY AT ALL. Its outside her range. She doesn't even see
social quality."
Thanks.
dmb
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 02 2003 - 21:45:34 BST