From: Paul Turner (paulj.turner@ntlworld.com)
Date: Tue Sep 16 2003 - 09:07:28 BST
Hi Scott
[Scott:]
I see them as the same thing. The L of CI does not try to articulate the
ineffable. It tries to articulate the ineffability of the ineffable.
[Paul:]
OK. I am beginning to see that, thanks. I still don't know if it's
necessary [personally] but I'm a lot clearer on how you are using it.
> [Paul:]
> I see thinking very much as part of experience, but not the whole
thing
> and not in a "directionally creator relation" to experience [I'm not
> ready to accept that aspect of Barfield].
[Scott:]
Hmm. I believe it was perception that Barfield considered to be in a
"directionally creator relation" to experience, not thinking. I'll have
to
check.
[Paul:]
He meant figuration, which he says may or may not be a kind of thinking.
If we are talking about "differentiating experience mentally" being a
kind of thinking then thinking is part of figuration.
Paul
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 16 2003 - 09:08:43 BST