MD Science, humanities and the quantum soul

From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:46:10 BST

Next message: Ian Glendinning: "RE: MD science and the humanities - R M Young"

Previous message: Ray Cox: "Re: MD The Not-So-Simpleminds at play"
In reply to: David MOREY: "MD science and the humanities"
Next in thread: Yale Landsberg: "Re: MD Science, humanities and the quantum soul"
Reply: Yale Landsberg: "Re: MD Science, humanities and the quantum soul"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Just by way of cross-linking threads (and at the risk of stating the
obvious) duality is of course fundamental to quantum considerations too.
Ian Glendinning.

PS Dawkins is very sceptical (nay scathing) of those who see a great
convergence - but I fall for it every time.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
[mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]On Behalf Of David MOREY
  Sent: 12 September 2003 21:00
  To: moq_discuss@moq.org
  Subject: MD science and the humanities

Hi all

  The humanities are about discussing values and morals,
  the sciences are about avoiding talk about morals and values.
  See link below to a discussion of this byRobert M Young.
  He suggests we need to take a look at the dualisms of:

humanities - science

society - science

culture - nature

qualitative - quantitative

value - fact

purpose - mechanism

subject - object

internal - external

secondary- primary (qualities)

thought - extension

mind - body

character - behaviour