From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:23:11 BST
Hi Paul,
I agree with your post so have not included it here. If any of the following
is not in harmony with that post it is my misunderstanding entirely at play.
For many years now i have been happy to forget about subjects and objects - i
think in terms of values and processes.
In this view, i do not find subjects and objects at all. I understand
subjects and objects may dissolve into the MoQ, so in a sense they may be said to be
still there but subsumed; but to understand that in their subsuming they
become something other than common sense Western culture asserts them to be is very
important otherwise one, errrrr, misses the point?
I like to say in fact that there are no subjects and objects in the MoQ.
Have just begun formal study of Indian philosophy, and in the very first hour
so much was said to reinforce the MoQ i left the lecture room one very
contented bunny. :)
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:24:33 BST