Re: MD Sit on my faith.

From: james marshall (edgarj@shaw.ca)
Date: Sun Dec 07 2003 - 01:58:15 GMT

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Sit on my faith."

    On 5 Dec 2003 4:34 PM Jim asks:
     
    "Then the aesthetic nature of the MoQ is a value blind spot to those holding
    faith?"
     
    Hi Jim, and forum,
     
    Jim: holding beauty and chaos! The 'choosing unit' of an individual is an
    an intense coherence between static quality within and across levels." When
    a microbe eats, is the microbe beyond gravity? I do not know if a Buddhist
    would see this as a problem. The theory of evolution does have an intense
    coherence between static quality within and across levels. The theory of
    evolution is part of the aesthetic nature of the MoQ.
     
    "The nature of beauty depends on the levels involved and their relationship
    to each other." "Render to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God
    s and to Me what is Mine." Does this create an impassable gulf between
    Buddhism and Christianity? Maybe Jim knows.
     
    Jim asks - resolutely holding faith are looking only at a comprehension of
    existence, an emotional point of view so to speak. Does the aesthetic
    nature of the MoQ pertain to existence, purpose, quality, individually or
    comprehensively? Whatever the answer, I see no problem between a person
    holding faith and the aesthetic nature of the MoQ. Apples and Oranges!
     
    Jim's hint at the vibrature of the vibration of every living thing -
    suggests the beauty of musical harmony is as natural as living, and the
    aesthetic the MoQ may have laws of its own.
     
    Thanks, Mark, for raising an interesting point.
     
    Joe
     
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
    To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:04 PM
    Subject: MD Sit on my faith.

    Dear forum,
    A Buddhist may have no problem at all regarding the, 'choosing unit' of an
    individual to be,

    An intense coherence between static quality within and across levels. *

    A Christian, for example, may find this disturbing and wish to affirm
    individuality? Therefore, is ii possible for the MoQ to be seen for what it
    is by those dominated by religious patterns of value?
    If the following holds:

    The nature of beauty depends on the levels involved and their relationship
    to each other. *

    Then the aesthetic nature of the MoQ is a value blind spot to those holding
    faith?

    All the best,
    Mark

    * From The edge of Chaos.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 07 2003 - 05:34:09 GMT