From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Tue Jan 13 2004 - 06:50:15 GMT
Dear Matt,
You wrote 20 Dec 2003 11:55:50 -0600:
'I would wish that you drop "philosophical" and just say "vocabulary"[in
what I wrote: "Intellectual agreement requires (or implies, if you prefer) a
shared philosophical vocabulary."] I don't think there is anything called
"philosophical analysis" that is different from simple "analysis".'
Yes, intellectual agreement requires a shared vocabulary. But didn't you
define 'philosophy' as something like 'finding out how everything hangs
together'? Doesn't that make "philosophical analysis" different from simple
"analysis"?
The question I asked you was, whether (you agree) we need a shared
vocabulary (or even philosophical vocabulary) to get (more) 'social stuff'
done (like feeding, clothing and educating people).
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 13 2004 - 07:16:29 GMT