Re: MD Speaking of musical excellence

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 11 2004 - 19:00:38 GMT

  • Next message: David MOREY: "Re: MD SOLAQI as Greeks bearing gifts"

    Hi Poot

    the list of Yes fans at this site is positively
    bulging for some strange reason, anyone else want
    to confess?

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Matt poot" <mattpoot@hotmail.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:31 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Speaking of musical excellence

    > Hello Platt,
    >
    > You said: No one is writing classical music today? Check out:
    >
    >
    http://dir.yahoo.com/Entertainment/Music/Artists/By_Genre/Classical/Compose
    > rs/20th_Century_and_Contemporary/
    >
    > I say: Well, I did not say that classical music is not being written.
    What
    > I said was that no one writes music like mozart today. Mozart was a
    musical
    > genius, the likes I have not heard of in today's society.
    >
    > You said: What emotions are you talking about? Have feelings of love and
    > hate
    > changed in the past 300 years?
    >
    > I say: Perhaps the emotions of love and hate have not changed. This does
    > not mean that his music is solely a reflection of his emotions. Would not
    > his surroundings, which give rise to the events of his life, which made
    him
    > draw certain conclusions, which also made him feel a certain way after
    > things happen to him. It is like saying if I had lived in the past, I
    would
    > feel exactly the same emotions as I did then, in exactly the same way.
    > Because our world is different, every aspect of his life would change. He
    > would have to also manage modern elements of our current world, which did
    > not exist in his time. Many principles are similar, but not the same. If
    > Mozart was still a musical genius at some comparable level today, he would
    > never have become so poor(unless he spent his money like michael jackson).
    >
    > Mozart lived in a world without technology. There are many, many,
    > instruments that have been invented or discovered (eastern music) that
    would
    > have a profound impact on his music. What if mozart had taken some trips
    to
    > japan or india when he was touring the world? I could not see this as
    > having any small affect on his music.
    >
    >
    > You said: In addition to emblazoning "Truth is a species of good" on every
    > page of
    > the MOQ syllabus I'd add "Some things are better than others." In other
    > words, great art is drenched in Spirit while lesser art (like most art
    > being created today) is as Spiritually dry as dust. What's more, I claim
    > all of us can tell the difference! (Recall Pirsig's experiment with his
    > students regarding their ability to discern quality writing.)
    >
    > I say: O.k. So there is a large quantity of crap being produced today,
    > which is little more than a few notes jotted on paper, etc. In Mozarts
    > time, was most of the music being produced good? I would say no. there
    > were a small amount of composers/artists who were truly good. Spirit was
    in
    > their music. How about the other 90% of the music? Most of it was folk
    > music. All of the rest, was written by people trying to make money off of
    > sounding like mozart, or whoever was good at the time. There is something
    > to be said for originality.
    >
    > You said: Many art authorities agree, so it's not ridiculous at all.
    > Collective
    > judgments of experts brings purely subjective opinions closer to
    > objectivity.
    >
    > I say: Many authorities also rebuke pirsigs theories. Does that make
    them
    > right, or closer to being right? It may seem so.
    >
    >
    > You said: What are you talking about? Please give examples. Are you
    talking
    > about
    > Snoop Doggy Dog?.
    >
    >
    > I say: Well, as I dont listen to Snoop Dogg, I couldn't say for sure.
    But
    > looking at some of the artists, and the places they grew up in, how can
    you
    > expect them to compose like Mozart?
    > Illiteracy and ineducation are maing factors.
    >
    > However, I will give you a top pick list of artists I either listen to,
    or
    > have listened to, which I consider to be good;
    > (Current at top)
    > King Crimson
    > Yes
    > Buck-65 ('rap')
    > Pink Floyd
    > RadioHead
    >
    > It is the aim towards quality that makes a difference for me. Also, to say
    > that these artists don't put their spirit fully into their music is a lie.
    > Listen to 'The Wall' , by Roger Waters (and the rest of Pink Floyd) in its
    > entirety ,. and tell me there is not great spirit in that.
    >
    >
    > Time is short, so I cant continue.
    >
    > What do you think?
    >
    >
    > Poot
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
    >
    http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 11 2004 - 19:36:55 GMT