From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 17:37:45 GMT
That being said, I'd have to answer your question with some of my own. IS the
music actually becoming dynamic? Is the music static and the "current mood"
dynamic? Or is reality the sole dynamic entity and all the rest are static
patterns enhancing/effecting reality, maybe throwing a false sense of musical
dynamicness around?
Everyone's thoughts?
Dan
Hi Dan,
May i just say that, 'The influence' got me seriously into Bach in the first
place. I feel, 'The influence' helps our patterns to become more coherent in
the moment, and leaves higher Quality patterns in its wake. I refer to music
appreciation only - there may be other negative residues i could not recommend.
Before my influenced experience, Bach was just gibberish to me. But after, i
was stunned by the beauty to be found. Now i don't need any influence to help
me, which is interesting?
Once i was into Bach, so much Quality music flooded in it was quite an eye
opener. I think my appreciation of modern jazz got a huge kick from it, to the
point that Thelonious Monk was appreciated in ways i did not think possible.
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 16 2004 - 18:08:52 GMT