Re: MD Definition of 'liberal'

From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 10:35:34 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Definition of 'liberal'"

    In essence, 'liberal' in the context of US politics is equivalent to 'socialist' in EU politics.

    Sam

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Johannes Volmert" <jvolmert@student.uni-kassel.de>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:53 PM
    Subject: MD Definition of 'liberal'

    > Hi MoQers,
    >
    > this question is directed more to the American fellows on this platform.
    > What I don't really understand concerning American culture in general
    > and this election specifically is the use of the concept of 'liberal'.
    > To make sure my miscomprehension does not arise from basical
    > misunderstanding of the word 'liberal' , I'd looked it up in my foreign
    > words dictionary. It says under: 1.(I read this as: most important
    > meaning) 'to impose as less as possible restrictions to the individual
    > [person]' ... and farther down 'liberalize' : 'to free from [all]
    > restrictions', which is what Liberals in Germany - (5-7% support) -
    > want; precisely: no government involvement into market/economy.
    > The reason to dwell on that is, that I consider it to be as one of
    > Pirsigs messages in his two books - as pronounced by most philosophers
    > by the way - that an individual should aim at making independant
    > choices in all his doings; taking responsibility for what he does. To do
    > so he should get rid of - or better - should carefully review his
    > opinions to sort out those, that basically stick to the social and not
    > the intellectual level.
    > Furthermore, Pirsig pleads for a free market in contrast to a guided
    > marked. Note that this also fits the definition of what I quoted above
    > from my dictonary.
    >
    > What I do not understand - and I follow the American press quite
    > intensively during the last weeks - why some MOQ-discussers on this
    > platform oppose so fervently all people that call themselves 'liberal'!
    > This stand does not seem to fit to basical 'Pirsig-standards' IMO.
    > Maybe, Platt, you could explain that to me as you seem to oppose very
    > much American 'liberals'.
    >
    > Regards, JoVo
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 17 2004 - 10:38:06 GMT