Re: MD quality religion

From: RycheWorld@aol.com
Date: Fri Mar 26 2004 - 14:41:26 GMT

Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."

Previous message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."
Maybe in reply to: Wim Nusselder: "MD quality religion"
Next in thread: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD quality religion"
Reply: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD quality religion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Wim,

In response to your thread let me ask this question - because I don't
know. How can any religion be better through voting? OR - What will a vote on
what religion is better "prove"? I find that I am constantly trying to DIS-prove
any religion because, depending on the person, their surroundings, etc...how
can any religion be "better" than another. I am lost in this argument. Please
assist!

Dan

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."
Previous message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."
Maybe in reply to: Wim Nusselder: "MD quality religion"
Next in thread: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD quality religion"
Reply: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD quality religion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 26 2004 - 14:42:56 GMT