From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Tue Apr 13 2004 - 11:26:44 BST
Hi chaps
On this one Mark I understand your fears about the Chritian perspective
but am pretty sure they do not apply to Sam. I am not a Christian
myself but there are religious ways to retain some grasp of DQ
that is excluded in SOM. You said:
Mark 11-4-04: Well, i am not. Theistic concerns are, by their nature,
very largely patterned in social values.
This is to say that what may have begun at one level cannot play a role
at another, even being transformed,
at what level do neurons contribute for example? I see this as a bit of
a dated comment, assuming
that our culture only moves forward and away from the religious eras,
just as romanticism keeps
re-emerging so will religious thought. In terms of religious thought, to
exclude what is happening in practice,
some of the most interesting thought currently happening is appearing
out of the post-secular side
of philosophy and theology, and is going beyond post-modernism. But this
is early days and few people are yet
aware of it, keep your eyes open for it, I am pretty sure a post-secular
change is coming, and I think this is
a positive way of breaking out of SOM. We need to learn from each other
and not be so sure that our perspective
is as broad as we like to think in our more confined moments.
regards
David M
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 13 2004 - 15:14:01 BST