From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 21:55:53 BST
Dear Sam,
It's not fair! I propose a competion and rules. You say you're game. I
present my nominee, you present yours. And then you unsubscribe because
someone doesn't play by the rules before I even have had enough time to
react...
You present your nominee as inhabiting the 3rd level and being best in
founding the 4th.
You mix that up with arguments that Christianity can be integrated with your
(adapted) version of the MoQ and that the 3rd level as defined by you is
really needed as foundation for the 4th level as defined by you.
These arguments are not what what this thread was meant for (by me) and it
doesn't surprise me that they invited the kind of debate your feared. You
more or less asked for it and Mark didn't play by my rules (and didn't
propose different rules either) by answering you in the way he did.
My main question to you is: how does it show in (religious) practice that
your nominee is best in founding the 4th level, in allowing people to hear
the music (i.e. have mystical experience) themselves?
You 'THINK Christianity works, most especially when it is grounded in the
life, death and resurrection of Christ' (i.e. for content-related reasons),
but how do you EXPERIENCE it? Do Christians hear more 'music' than
non-Christians? What brand of Christianity is best in founding the 4th level
according to you?
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 21 2004 - 23:03:18 BST