Re: MD Religion of the future.

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 15:28:51 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Religion of the future."

    Hi Mark Heyman,

    > Is there a way to approach DQ without religion?

    You bet. Religion not required to experience DQ.

    > I'm enjoying this thread,
    > and am very familiar with ZMM and Lila, and neither of those books in any
    > fashion endorses anything approximating religion, as far as I can tell.

    You're right. The MOQ doesn't endorse any religion.

    > Noam Chomsky has said that he thinks it's dangerous to let one's life be
    > motivated by non-rational belief systems, and provides plenty of historical
    > evidence in support. Just wondrin' what y'all think...
     
    As usual, Chomsky doesn't know what he is talking about. Every belief
    system contains an initial premise the system cannot verify or explain and
    must be accepted on faith. Rational beliefs systems are no exception.
    Chomsky needs to check Godel's Theorem. Furthermore, the rational
    cause/effect system breaks down completely at the quantum level, not to
    mention it's inability to answer, "What caused the Big Bang?" Chomsky and
    all of his ilk would do well to read and ponder ZMM and Lila, especially
    the latter which describes how intellectuals with their worship of
    scientific rationalism have made a holy mess of things.

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 04 2004 - 15:58:35 BST