Re: MD Freedom and quality

From: Elizabeth Graves (libertytowercranes@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 07 2004 - 05:48:15 BST

  • Next message: Elizabeth Graves: "RE: MD (no subject)"

    freedom and quality at first glance an oxymoron BUT actually cant have one
    without the other. quality is something that must be searched for case in
    point this web site, and persig. i am terrified to speak on this web site,
    i have ideas but you all probably have thought all i have thought before and
    i am way scared

    >From: "David Morey" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >Subject: Re: MD Freedom and quality
    >Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:29:32 +0100
    >
    >Hi Joe
    >
    >I would like to see some quality built into
    >the relationship between voters and their
    >representatives. How should we choose
    >someone to represent us? I would like to
    >see a more complex system. People should
    >get together with other people of like minds
    >in small groups and select 1/2 people to
    >represent them. Those selected should then
    >seek like minds and again select 1/2 reps
    >from that group, until we get down to a small group
    >of ultimate leaders. At any time the nominating groups
    >should be able to call back their reps to ask them to
    >account for their choices and actions, basically so
    >you get a much more dynamic structure. If quality decisions
    >are happening you get few recalls, when the reps go astray
    >they get called back and easily replaced. Any good?
    >
    >regards
    >David M
    >----- Original Message -----
    >From: "Joe" <jhmau@sbcglobal.net>
    >To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:34 AM
    >Subject: Re: MD Freedom and quality
    >
    >
    > > On 4 July 2004 12:35 PM David M writes:
    > >
    > >
    > > Hi all
    > >
    > > If we wanted to start a political
    > > party that was compatible with the MOQ
    > > what would it be like? I would like to suggest
    > > we call it the freedom and quality party.
    > > What do we stand for?
    > >
    > > Hi David,
    > >
    > > Recently in CA USA the governor was changed by a recall vote. There was
    >no
    > > judicial review of the former governor. There is a recall provision in
    >the
    > > CA constitution. I had a bad feeling that changing a person in
    >authority
    >by
    > > a vote in this way was odd. How would you propose to choose the leaders
    >of
    > > a freedom quality party, by vote or by qualification? I think a
    >political
    > > system cannot tolerate chaos and order must be provided for.
    > >
    > > Joe Maurer
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    >http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >Mail Archives:
    >Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 07 2004 - 05:51:00 BST