From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Mon Aug 02 2004 - 00:14:15 BST
Hi MM, DMB, Horse, All
DMB and I rarely agree on anything, but in the case of Mark's "coherence"
interpretations of the MOQ, I couldn't agree with DMB more. Mark's
"coherence" theory is, for the most part, incoherent.
Dear Platt,
You are confused:
A. Coherence is not an interpretation of the MOQ.
B. Coherence is a philosophical term derived from the MOQ to explain the
common language idiom, sweet spot. This term is used to explore further instances
of coherence.
Anyone who suggests the following:
1. The Intellectual level of the MOQ is improved by regarding it as the level
of the Individual,
2. Insists Rush Limbaugh is higher Intellectual Quality than Noam Chomsky,
is very clearly in no position to comment on the MOQ.
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 02 2004 - 00:15:41 BST