2000 05:48:35 PST
X-Originating-IP: [195.152.97.13]
From: "Philip Wigg" <philip_wigg@hotmail.com>
To: moq_focus@moq.org
Subject: Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS - February 2000
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:48:35 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-moq_focus@venus.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: moq_focus@moq.org
a) 'Lila' was described in one it's reviews as 'having little to add but
more dull taxonomy'. Given that trying to solve moral dilemmas using MOQ
seems to create as much debate and confusion as not using MOQ and there also
seems to be considerable confusion as to the interpretion of Pirsig's
levels, is this a fair criticism?
b) SOM that seems to attract so much blame is also described as, 'a straw
man, a position held by no-one'. Who exactly does hold a purely SOM
position? Who completely denies the existence of Quality? If nobody, or very
few people, who or what are we criticising?
Phil.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:18 BST