I vote for #2
> Please vote for only one of the topics listed below.
>
> 1. 'Lila' was described in one it's reviews as 'having little to add but
> more dull taxonomy'. Given that trying to solve moral dilemmas using MOQ
> seems to create as much debate and confusion as not using MOQ and there also
> seems to be considerable confusion as to the interpretion of Pirsig's
> levels, is this a fair criticism?
> (Philip Wigg)
>
> 2. SOM that seems to attract so much blame is also described as, 'a straw
> man, a position held by no-one'. Who exactly does hold a purely SOM
> position? Who completely denies the existence of Quality? If nobody, or very
> few people, who or what are we criticising?
> (Philip Wigg)
>
> 3. In addition to LILA and ZMM which other books would you recommend
> to members of MOQ.org?
> (Diana McPartlin)
>
> Cheers
> Diana
>
> MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:18 BST