Hi Moffers
Philip Wigg's second suggestion received most votes so February's topic will be:
The subject-object metaphysics (SOM) that seems to attract so much blame
is also described as, 'a straw man, a position held by no-one'. Who exactly
does hold a purely SOM position? Who completely denies the existence of
Quality? If nobody, or very few people, who or what are we criticising?
Cheers
Diana
***********************************************************
Voting results
#1 Votes = 5
'Lila' was described in one it's reviews as 'having little to add but
more dull taxonomy'. Given that trying to solve moral dilemmas using MOQ
seems to create as much debate and confusion as not using MOQ and there also
seems to be considerable confusion as to the interpretion of Pirsig's
levels, is this a fair criticism?
(John Beasley, Horse, David Buchanan, Cntryforce, David L Thomas)
#2 Votes = 10
SOM that seems to attract so much blame is also described as, 'a straw
man, a position held by no-one'. Who exactly does hold a purely SOM
position? Who completely denies the existence of Quality? If nobody, or very
few people, who or what are we criticising?
(Magnus Berg, Andreas Deppner, Gene Kofman, Glenn Bradford, Bodvar
Skutvik, Denis Poisson, Lloyd Klinedinst, Marco, Johannes Volmert, Todd)
#3 Votes = 2
In addition to LILA and ZMM which other books would you recommend
to members of MOQ.org?
(Jaap Karssenberg, Roger Parker)
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:18 BST