2000 15:04:13 PST
X-Originating-IP: [209.18.22.249]
From: "John Aaron O'Laughlin" <johnnyo_9@hotmail.com>
To: moq_focus@moq.org
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:04:13 CST
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-moq_focus@venus.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: moq_focus@moq.org
If one thing can never actually view itself, due to continuity in space and
time, how then are any assumptions or theories made about anything? E.g.
The state of nature never actually existed, but it is a fundamental tool in
determining many characteristic in a wide range of studies. By removing
certain accepts of one thing a solution or best coarse of action can be
determined. So it is not that science is wrong or religion is useless, but
rather incomplete. Each and every idea constructed in the human mind is a
direct result of insufficient information. Humans knowing this inadequacy
developed a way of determining idea by relying on mirror-image. In order to
see your own eye you must look at the eye as it exists outside of your
immediate perception and view it in external reflection. I can see my own
eye but not through my eye rather through an image of the eyes separate from
its system. But the eye does not lose its purpose simply because it is out
of its element. It simply remains incomplete. So the ìIî could then be
separated and have an idea of an idea, but it remains lacking. The first is
the idea of the eye on its own, and the second as the eye with purpose and
function in a system. One actually does taste the food by its use of the
tongue and if one did not try and taste the tongue the sensory date would
remain lost, and therefore no taste would exist. Food has taste not due to
the make-up of itself, but the make-up of ability to taste. We exist then
not to think about the subject, but to think about thinking about the
subject. Objectivity is then not contained in subjectivity or the inverse.
They are both contained in the idea of each. Yes one cannot be without the
other, or it could, but would remain incomplete. To complete objectivity
and subjectivity it is essential to think about them. Matter is mind, and
mind is matter, but they remain dormant until they are thought about. And
in thinking about the thought of each paves the way for the human conscience
and existence period.
As infinite does not exist then neither does finite. If something can never
stop it can also never start. It is impossible to grasp zero, just as it is
impossible to grasp infinity. But they exist due to the intangible idea of
their meaning. Their meaning remains incomplete as all things are, but the
general sense can be determined. Asking why do we exist is the same as
asking what is the first number. For out of zero there can be nothing and
out of something you can never get zero. So existence is not finding a
start or end, but having the idea that a start or end exists.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:18 BST