I looked among the past programs, and I think these are three good
questions:
1) In the event of an inter-level conflict is it ALWAYS the case that the
higher level of Value, as defined in the MOQ, has moral superiority? Are
there instances where this is not the case and how are they resolved? How is
it possible to recognize and/or resolve an intra-level moral conflict?
2) Is this static-dynamic split merely an epistemic convenience that we make
arbitrarily or is it an ontological reality, transcending our thoughts and
intellectual description of it?
3) What would our world look like today if the Sophists had won the debate
over the primacy of Truth over Quality?
Ciao.
Marco.
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:18 BST