Hi All
Thanks for a good month of generally on topic posts. If you want to continue the
Science/Emotivism topic then feel free to avail yourselves of the moq_discuss forum.
The program for August will be:
Explain why the Dynamic is more moral than the static. We cannot leave this hanging. For
example, we could grade morality, ala Ken Wilbur, based upon the degree of pattern as a
whole and as a part. The problem here is that this is not just adding to the MOQ, it is
CHANGING it. However, it solves LOTS of problems!
with the results at the end of this post.
To get some further background on the above see Rogers post of 22/07/00
This months discussion facilitator is Diana.
Horse
================================
Voting Results
1)
(From Roger (RiskyBiz9) Parker's post of 22 July 2000)
Explain why the Dynamic is more moral than the static. We
cannot leave this hanging. For example, we could grade morality, ala Ken
Wilbur, based upon the degree of pattern as a whole and as a part. The
problem here is that this is not just adding to the MOQ, it is CHANGING it.
However, it solves LOTS of problems!
(Horse)
[Hamish Muirhead, Richard Budd, Andreas Deppner,
Rich Pretti, Mark Butler, Marco, Mary Wittler,
3)
In salute of the completion of the human genetic map, our full DNA code. My
topic suggestion is: What "Exacatly Happens" (or happened) in between the
Inorganic level and the Biological level? or Let's make some soup! :)
(Todd)
[Tony Westley, Andrew Bowen, Todd/Gem7th]
------- End of forwarded message -------
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:25 BST