Rog and all - Hello.
"In general, given a choice of two courses to follow and all other things
being equal, that choice which is more dynamic, that is, at a higher level
of evolution, is more moral." pg. 183
or . . .
In many circumstances (but not all), and given only two alternatives to
choose from, and with all other things being equal, then the more dynamic
alternative of the two choices available, the one at a higher level of
evolution, is more moral.
If I test this by turning it upside down, and trying to staying right on
topic . . . then . .
Against a background of a certain set of circumstances, (the three variables
that precede "the statement in question") would it be more moral to choose
the other alternative in the equation, the alternative at the lower level of
evolution?
Intellect? Or Emotivism?
Given these three variables that precede "the statement", is there a
problem?
If one alters or removes them - then yes. Otherwise, I'm not so sure.
Just asking . . it could be me . . .
Tony Westley
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:25 BST