To: Andreas, Jonathan, Mark and Dan,
I have drafted responses to all 4 of your posts, but I need to proofread the
other three. It is getting late and I am getting foggier and foggier. So let
me start with this one.
ANDREAS:
When one applies Ken Wilbers BIG three questions on the actual monthly issue
we find two essential puzzle pieces which fit very well with each other and
gives an interesting perspective on the meeting point of Dynamic Quality,
Static Quality and an third independent existing entity which differs from
both and which I call the choosing self.
ROG:
A third and independent entity? If we view DQ as pure experience prior to
rational division into here and there, now and then, subject and object,
internal and external, choosing self and choice; and we view sq as the sliced
up static and discontinuous world of Maya (the prior divisions), can we
eliminate these problems?
And is this what Dan means when he speaks of the choiceless choice?
Roger
PS -- I will mail the other response in the morning. And now David
re-enters!!!!
*********************************
Ah Grasshopper! It is time to leave!
*********************************
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:26 BST