Mfer's
In their books ''Metaphors We Live By'' and "Philosophy In The Flesh"
George Lakoff and Mark Johnson make the following points: "The mind is
inherently embodied. Thought is mostly unconscious. Abstract concepts
are largely metaphorical."
According to Lakoff, metaphor appears to be a neural mechanism that allows
us to adapt the neural systems used in sensory-motor activity to create forms
of abstract reason. "If this is correct, as it seems to be," he says, "our
sensory-motor systems thus limit the abstract reasoning that we can perform.
Anything we can think or understand is shaped by, made possible by, and
limited by our bodies, brains, and our embodied interactions in the
world. This is what we have to theorize with."
Assuming there is value to this theory: Let's explore the relationship
between metaphors and the MoQ ? Are they primary to its development? If
so, which ones, how many, etc? The goal being
if an understandable metaphor or a series of metaphors could be found it
might possibly be the elusive "catechism of the MoQ"
3WD
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:26 BST