3WD and all,
> "The reason there is a difference between individual evaluations of
> quality is that although Dynamic Quality is constant, these static
> patterns are different for everyone because each person has a different
> static pattern of life history. Both the Dynamic Quality and the static
> patterns influence his final judgement. That is why their is some
> uniformity among individual value judgements but not complete
> uniformity." SODV pp 12-13
>
> The key word here is "constant". What does he mean? James' "continous
> flux" and Pirsig's " stream of quality events going on for ever and
> ever" seem similar enough call them both "Dynamic Quality". So
> "constant" might best be translated as an "on going", " continous flux",
> of events as opposed to "constant" equaling "absolute" or "unchanging"
> or more importantly "unchangable."
> Does the MoQ posit you or I can influence or change dynamic events?
> It's just not clear.
>
Metaphorically speaking....
I imagine DQ like the horizon. While I'm moving towards the horizon, it
is "on going" and its shape is changing, but it's also constantly far,
wide, unreachable.
Ciao.
Marco.
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:26 BST