Hi Mof'fers,
Since the last summary of Diana already contains numerous problems as well as
vague points, to which I mainly agree, it looks to me, as if there is not much
to add in the end. At the risk of only repeating other members points in a
different look, I will however try to express one thing I have in mind already
since the early beginnings (my own).
yummy@netfront.net wrote:
>
> MFs
>
> The votes have been counted (yes all of them) and we have a winner:
>
> We've talked about our favorite passages from LILA, and we've talked about what
> it has meant for us. Now let's turn it around and ask, what's wrong with the MOQ?
> My intention is that we make a checklist of all the loopholes, inconsistencies and
> weaknesses of the MOQ. The initial objective is not to solve all the problems, just to
> identify them and create a "to do" list for future dialog.
Whenever talking about the relationship between DQ and sq, so how comes
something new into the whole development, I thought about what/who in particular
is the originator of new input at last. Or in other words, what happens exactly
in a quality event, might that be a bigger or a smaller one. I consider it to be
important to name mechanisms or any sort of value-being, so the conditions under
which quality events are thought to happen. Of course, there are quality events
happening all of the time, but you may agree with me that there are some of
extraordinary value, giving the overall development/evolution a new direction.
In that sense I believe, that, though DQ is a constant flux or streaming, all
quality events are discrete events in the end and that there must be something
special, that is responsible for those quality events.
In short:
What could be added or specified to show what is responsible for a quality
event; is it a special condition or are there special individuals, carriers of
quality concerning it's level, sensing dynamic quality, that helps dynamic
quality to become expressed and integrateted into the whole.
Although it may look like, as if I'm talking about humans only - my pet theory
;-) - I want to stress, that I believe there must be something like this in
between all levels, not only the intelletual level. I can't see until now,
whether it's only a condition AND necessarily a carrier being sensible for
dynamic input or perhaps only a condition during the process out of which any
carrier could rise to pick it up.
Kind regards,
JoVo
countdown:6
"Ÿhemm,....not much I must admit...maybe enough to reach the next stop at least
and doing some quality adjustments there,....perhaps? What's next?"
"Fool, you are! Next stop is Engineer-town and only then we get to....Damm!
..temperature dial still high! Air supply down as well!..."
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:29 BST