Diana and moffers,
> there's no process for consolidating ideas. Without any static latches
> we start from scratch every time, and that is what I'm trying to
address
> this month.
>
> Diana
I agree, Diana. What do you think? Is it time to change the rules?
Or.... ?
I dare suggest a new procedure, just as matter of discussion:
1) Create a permanent and dynamic "to do" list.
2) Create a matching "done" list, including the month's conclusions. As
there's no one only truth, the conclusions can be more than one. IMO we
must find an effective way to reach clear conclusions. Maybe the
facilitators will need some help.
3) Every month the discussion facilitator will choose the argument from
the "to do" list. It will be communicated with a 15/20 days advance, so
that it will be possible for the people to search for good arguments.
4) New suggestions will be added to the "to do" list only if they are
reputed: a) interesting, by at least a certain number of persons (5?);
and b) relevant and innovative by the facilitator(s).
5) Of course the "done" list must not be static forever, so new
suggestions can be offered in order to argue old conclusions. But only
in case of doubts or new facts.
6) The "done" list should be available on the site not only ordered by
date, but also organized in "macro" areas.
I repeat, I offer these lines merely as matter of discussion, if there's
someone interested by static latches.
bye
Marco
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:29 BST