MF Quality=Morality=Reality

From: Bobby Dillon (dillon121@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 08 2001 - 02:36:41 GMT


Focusers,

>Quality=Morality=Reality

As i interpret it , this statement in a nutshell conveys the idea
that whatever is experienced has value, therefore is real, conveys
a certain moral significance, or reflects an underlying value.

So if the experienced is taken as Reality , then Quality is the
value of the experience, and Morality is the resultant choice
based upon this value.

The opposite of Quality & Reality is Illusion, that is, an
experience that has the deceptive appearence of high percieved
value whereas its Real or Potential Value is low, or alternately
the experience that is perceived to be of low value but
actually has a high inherent or Potential Value.

The catch is that illusory value is never perceived as illusory
by the beholder, for as soon as it is realised as illusory,
it ceases to be so.

The opposite of Morality is Immorality, that is, choice
based upon illusory values.

Self-Realisation is Quality and self-deception is its
opposite.

Real Value (DQ) transcends time, space and death and
illusory Value is transitory although not all transitory
value is illusory.

Real Value is INDEPENDENT of percieved rewards or punishments,
illusory value is derived from percieved or anticipated
rewards or punishments.

Real Value only evolves with time, and the force of this real
value evolves Static Morals, whereas the force of illusory
value devolves Static Morals.

Transitory Value or Static Morals (SQ) is the MEANS by which
Dynamic Quality or Real Value is put to test and thereby
refines itself, and therefore needs illusory value to serve
as a counterpart for this process that takes place in time
and space.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:30 BST