As public education increasingly aligns itself with
standardized achievement tests and text book giants, and as
teachers then begrudgingly fall back on the chalk-and-talk/
drill-and-kill approach to education, what does the MOQ
have to offer?
Can we gleen an MOQ-based philosophy of education from
Pirsig's writing? How might public education benefit from
such a philosophy?
Mark Butler
--- Diana McPartlin <diana@hongkong.com> wrote:
> MF
>
> Well not much action this month but we'll press ahead
> anyway.
>
> The vote in January was to discuss a series of topics,
> and so far we've done:
> THE LEVELS and
> QUALITY, DYNAMIC QUALITY AND STATIC QUALITY and
> QUALITY = MORALITY = REALITY
>
> The next topic would be:
> *FREE WILL & SELF*
>
> and thereafter
> EVOLUTION & SPACE-TIME
> THEM PESKY INJUNS
>
>
> But you are welcome to suggest other topics for April
> I'll post the CALL FOR VOTES when it's time to vote,
> which should be on the
> 29th March.
>
> If you do suggest new topics, the usual rules apply:
>
> Please use the same subject line as this post when you
> submit your topic.
> You can propose more than one topic if you wish.
>
> Please distinguish clearly between the subject of the
> topic(s) you are proposing and what you wish to say about
> your topic(s). It
> would be helpful to list your topic(s) at the start of
> the post.
>
> We still have a number of unused suggestions from
> previous CALL FOR TOPICS archived at
> <http://www.moq.org/lilasquad/pastprograms.html>.
> Feel free to resubmit any of these for voting this month.
>
>
> Diana
>
>
>
>
> MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:30 BST