Some of the problems people have in understanding the MoQ may
stem from something even further back than LILA, and ZAMM may
be the place to consult here. As I see it, the SOM/MOQ transition
is concentrated in this passage in Chapter 19 (page 231. Corgi
Paperback):
> And finally: Phaedrus, following a path that to his knowledge had
> never been taken before in the history of Western thought, went
> straight between the horns of the subjectivity-objectivity dilemma
> and said Quality is neither a part of mind, nor is it part of matter.
> It is a THIRD entity which is independent of the two.
My topic suggestion is:
The statement made by Phaedrus of ZAMM (Chp.19) that Quality
does not reside in the material world is readily accepted, but the
rest of it - that it doesn't reside in the mind - seems more
obscure. What does it mean that Quality is not of mind?
Bo
------- End of forwarded message -------
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:31 BST