Foci,
Thanks for the huge contributions this month, since I'm not only flying but
even a real dutchman ;-) I had no time reading all responses, but I am very
delighted with all the email I see.
Some very short conclusions :
1) Since MOQ unites object and subject, the question slowly turns into:"
what are the subjectisch and objectisch parts of Quality ? "
2) There are no subjects nor objects in MOQ - there's just one (!!) being:
Quality.
3) I stay with the opinion that even a stone must have DQ components, taking
conclusion 2) I dare to say that any animal (interacting with the stone) is
such component.
4) Broadining conclusion 3) I would say that the stone I'm looking at is not
some object, apart from me the subject, but that it is a part of MY
anorganic level.
It might like I'm wandering of the topic, but it are conclusions folowing
the original question.
Keep up the discussion,
Jaap
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:31 BST