MF Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:43:09 +0530

From: Shylesh (shylesh.m@saint-gobain.co.in)
Date: Fri Aug 31 2001 - 14:41:27 BST

Next message: owner-moq_focus@venus.co.uk: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Atomic Swing: "Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS - September 2001"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hello everybody

If something qualifies as ABSTRACT (referring to an example from ZAMM...Quality!), then is it possible to retain its abstractiveness....coz then it is more like...."i dont understand it...hence it is abstract!"...which means for everything qualified as ABSTRACT by one person, there must be a threshold of understanding possessed by someone whos does not qualify it as abstract. this means that nothing can be absolutely abstract!
any thoughts?
shyguy

MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org

Next message: owner-moq_focus@venus.co.uk: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Atomic Swing: "Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS - September 2001"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:32 BST